Human Rights

What can be expected from the long-awaited reforms of the Mental Health Act?

 What’s just happened? 

On January 13th, 2021, the government released a White Paper in response Sir Simon Wessely’s proposed recommendations made in a 2018 report on reforming the Mental Health Act 1983 (MHA). [1] This will be followed by 12-weeks of public consultation, with a draft of a revised Mental Health Bill to be introduced when government time allows. [2]  

 What does this mean? 

An Independent Review of the Mental Health Act 1983 (MHA) conducted in 2018 which prioritised modernisation and reform to patient care made over 150 recommendations to the government. [3] Proposed changes emphasise the need for greater patient autonomy, tackling racial inequalities, and to better meet the needs of people with learning disabilities and autism. [4]  

In 2020 alone there were 50,893 new detentions under the Mental Health Act. [5] Too often people are being detained without their consent or rights being advocated for and receive insufficient therapeutic input on their wellbeing. However, individuals detained under the revised Mental Health Act will be able to nominate someone to represent them if they are unable to do so themselves, which will in turn provide patients with greater involvement in decisions about their care and treatment. [6] [7] The government have stated that the revised MHA will only intervene “proportionately, and which has their health and wellbeing as its central organising principle”. [8] 

“We know people are too often disempowered and excluded from decisions […] we will transform the act to put patients at the centre of decisions about their own care” [9] 

There are also significant disparities in current mental health services for people of BAME backgrounds who are over 4 times more likely to be detained under the act and subjected to poorer treatment options based on clinicians’ negative racial bias which must be immediately addressed and improved. [10] [11] 

The government has also highlighted numerous cases of quality failings in the care of people with learning disabilities and autism in inpatient settings. This will be addressed through a separate legal approach which will act on their manifesto pledge to the Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) made last year stating that “individuals within this group should only be in inpatient care for as short a time, as close to home and in the least restrictive setting possible, with a clear, therapeutic benefit, not as a last resort due to lack of appropriate community support”. [12]   

This will ensure that mental illness is the sole reason for detention under the act which will prevent the abhorrent experiences of individuals such as Alexis Quinn who was detained without her consent and received treatment she described as “sub-human” simply because she has autism. [13]  

However, there are some concerns over the longevity of these proposed reforms. David Greene, president of Law Society expressed concerns that new safeguards for people detained under the act must be sustainable, effective, and enforceable. [14] The government needs regard the legal and mental health mechanisms that will ultimately uphold the reform’s new services as a constant priority, without which there will be an “exponential demand that cannot be met, and consequentially, collapse”. [15] 

Assessing Firms:

#Cartwright King #Allen & Overy #Clifford Chance #Slaughter and May #Linklaters #Dentons #Pinsent Masons #Latham & Watkins #Taylor Wessing LLP #Addleshaw Goddard #Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer #Herbert Smith Freehills #Baker McKenzie #Simmons & Simmons, #Travers Smith #Hogan Lovells #Eversheds Sutherland #Irwin Mitchell #Leigh Day #Mayer Brown #Giambrone 

Written by Connie Barnes

References:

[1] 'Reforming the Mental Health Act' (GOV.UK, 2021) https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/reforming-the-mental-health-act/reforming-the-mental-health-act

[2] 'Changes That the Government Wants to Make to A Law Called the Mental Health Act' (GOV.UK, 2021) https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/changes-that-the-government-wants-to-make-to-a-law-called-the-mental-health-act-easy-read

[3] Tim Spencer-Lane, ‘How the government proposes to reform the Mental Health Act’ (Community Care, January 13th, 2021)

[4] Matt Roberts, ‘Mental Health Act undergoes landmark reforms’ (National Health Executive, January 14th, 2021)

[5] 'Mental Health Act Statistics, Annual Figures 2019-20 - NHS Digital' (NHS Digital, 2021) https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/mental-health-act-statistics-annual-figures/2019-20-annual-figures

[6] Ibid

[7] Christopher Hope, ‘Mental Health Act overhaul to allow sectioned people to choose family to represent them’ (The Telegraph, January 9th, 2021) 

[8] Ibid

[9] Alex Turnbull, ‘” Landmark” reform to mental health laws’ (Independent Nurse, 13th January 2021)

[10] Ibid

[11] ‘Discrimination in mental health services’ (Mind, June 2019)  

[12] Ibid 

[13] Alexis Quinn, ‘Autism is not a mental health issue, yet I was sectioned’ (Metro, January 18th, 2021)

[14] ‘Reform of the Mental Health Act must be properly funded’ (Law Society, January 15th, 2021) 

[15]Ibid

Disclaimer: This article (and any information accessed through links in this article) is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. 

Hate Crime Bill Compromising Free Speech?

Hate Crime Bill Compromising Free Speech?

Since its introduction, the Hate Crime Bill has split opinion. On the one hand, many believe it will positively enhance much needed protection for underrepresented or marginalised groups. On the other, many are concerned that the new Bill could have serious, albeit unintended, implications on the fundamental right of freedom of expression.

Big Brother is Watching

Big Brother is Watching

Standing steadfast as the first legal challenge of its kind, the Court in R (Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police found that South Wales Police’s use of the technology not only failed to adequately protect privacy rights, but fatally, did not fully account for the ways in which use of the technology unjustly discriminates against BAME groups.

The Environment Belongs to us all Equally- Does it though?

The Environment Belongs to us all Equally- Does it though?

What just happened?

With the recent mass rekindling of the Black Lives Matter protests following the cases of police brutality in the US, other forms of institutionalized racism have come back to light as well. The UK’s Office for National Statistics reported that as of the data updated till 9th June 2020 “for all ages the rate of deaths involving COVID-19 for Black males was 3.3 times greater than that for White males of the same age, while the rate for Black females was 2.4 times greater than for White females.”

Modern Slavery in a World of Fast Fashion

Modern Slavery in a World of Fast Fashion

What just happened?

Faulty fabrics, unflattering clothing, and damage to the environment are amongst many of the negative impacts associated with fast fashion, that have graced headlines across the world, over the past few years. However, leading fast-fashion retailer ‘Boohoo’ are now facing allegations of a more sinister crime, Modern slavery. Over the past few weeks, tabloids have exposed the retailer, which has been “exploiting workers for many years inside textile factories, located in Leicester.”

'Conversion Therapy' Still Legal in the UK Despite Government Promise

'Conversion Therapy' Still Legal in the UK Despite Government Promise

In July, Boris Johnson made yet another pledge to ensure that so-called conversion therapy will be made illegal in the UK, naming the practice “absolutely abhorrent”. This statement comes two years after the same promise made by former prime minister Theresa May, yet no progress in banning the practice has been made so far.

One Doctor Enough to Section a Person?

One Doctor Enough to Section a Person?

Temporary changes have been made to the UK Mental Health Act (MHA) 1983 due to the coronavirus outbreak, the Coronavirus Act 2020 is a new UK law to help under staffed mental health services cope during times of crisis. Although currently, the changes don’t apply, they are available to be used if the situation demands so.

‘Rough Sex’ no Longer a Viable Defence to Murder

‘Rough Sex’ no Longer a Viable Defence to Murder

In a clause added to the Domestic Abuse Bill, on 6th July 2020, the House of Commons ruled out ‘consent for sexual gratification’ as a defense for serious harm caused to a person. This would make it difficult for defendants in cases of sexual harm, rape or murder to take the defense that the offence occurred ‘accidentally’ in the course of sexual act that was completely consensual.

Labour Abuse: Who Picks my Fruit?

Labour Abuse: Who Picks my Fruit?

At the beginning of the summer, the government launched its ‘Pick for Britain’ campaign, to encourage the unemployed, furloughed or students to take minimum wage harvesting and packing jobs in the agricultural sector. An inquiry carried out by BBC’s Farming Today has revealed what the new workers experienced when performing roles usually held by foreign workers. The things they were faced with ranged from poor industry practices to fully-fledged human rights abuses and situations that could qualify as modern slavery.

Benefits Ban Ruled as Indirectly Discriminatory

Benefits Ban Ruled as Indirectly Discriminatory

A York County Court has ruled that the use of the ‘No DSS’ letting ban is unlawful, due to indirect discrimination. The case was brought by the charity Shelter on behalf of a disabled single mother who enquired about renting a two-bedroom property in the city and was told her application would not be considered as she was in receipt of housing benefit.